Coronavirus - COVID-19 Anti Trump Bias and Double Standards Fake News Propaganda Anti White Racism / Reverse Racism White Erasure / Great Replacement Systemic Racism White Privilege Health Crime Bigotry / Intolerance / Discrimination Race Baiting Violence and hate Subversion of country and society Fake Hate Crimes Leftists Right Wing / Alt Right Threat Canada Indoctrination / Brainwashing Leftist Policies Diversity and Multiculturalism Europe Immigration / Diversity / Multiculturalism Islam Attacks View All Categories
ABC News Biden CNN MSNBC New York Times NPR PBS Time Magazine Washington Post The Hill ADL Jewry Media Matters black privilege bigotry of low expectations minority privilege Trudeau Leftist companies to avoid BLM Twitter View All Tags

Health and Medicine

Studies and statistics about the current medical system and factors affecting our health and wellbeing

Apr 1, 2021

Corruption, fraud, deception, data manipulation, collusion, in the FDA

Lawyers who want to sue drug companies will be drooling over the news that the FDA has “certified” a 2009 letter sent anonymously by FDA staff to President Obama describing “systemic corruption and wrongdoing that permeates all levels of FDA.” FDA is riddled with politics, conflicts of interest and outright corruption, and is, as the letter says, “fundamentally broken.” https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fda-corruption-letter-authenticated-lawyers-start-your-engines/

Nine FDA scientists appealed to President George W. Bush and at the time, President-elect Barack Obama over pressure from management to manipulate data, mainly in relation to the review process for medical devices. These concerns were highlighted in a 2006 report[2] on the agency as well.[76]

Hidden conflicts? Pharma payments to FDA advisers after drug approvals spark ethical concerns https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/07/hidden-conflicts-pharma-payments-fda-advisers-after-drug-approvals-spark-ethical

Then very effective mass marketing takes over, and the FDA devotes only a small percent of its budget to protect physicians or patients from receiving biased or untruthful information. 34 The further corruption of medical knowledge through company-funded teams that craft the published literature to overstate benefits and understate harms, unmonitored by the FDA, leaves good physicians with corrupted knowledge. 5 6 Patients are the innocent victims. https://ethics.harvard.edu/blog/risky-drugs-why-fda-cannot-be-trusted

When the FDA finds scientific fraud or misconduct, the agency doesn’t notify the public, the medical establishment, or even the scientific community that the results of a medical experiment are not to be trusted. On the contrary. For more than a decade, the FDA has shown a pattern of burying the details of misconduct. https://slate.com/technology/2015/02/fda-inspections-fraud-fabrication-and-scientific-misconduct-are-hidden-from-the-public-and-doctors.html

Exposing the FDA’s Betrayal of America is a stunning exposé into the secret world of the FDA, Wall Street, and drug companies. At stake is the health and well-being of all Americans. Adverse reactions, even deaths, are hidden while dangerous drugs are pushed on Americans, especially children simply for profit. https://www.amazon.com/Fight-Your-Health-Exposing-Betrayal/dp/1933927178

FDA documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, revealed that the FDA has been concealing from the medical community and the public serious research misconduct; including fraud, deception, avoidable risks for human subjects — even deaths — that occurred in clinical trials.  https://ahrp.org/fda-conceals-collaborates-in-serious-research-misconduct-fraud-deception-adverse-events/

The Food and Drug Administration has a sordid history of scandals involving conflicts of interests, cover-ups, corruption and congressional investigations. A recent investigation into the approval and continued protection for the controversial sterilization device Essure, depicts classic examples of controversial conduct by the FDA  https://www.ennislaw.com/blog/essure-depicts-classic-examples-fda-conflicts-and-corruption/

former U.S. Food and Drug Administration official pleaded guilty to accepting a $20,000 bribe to expedite a generic drug maker’s application  https://apnews.com/4341009a667c3195829a79728d6774b3

A $1.8 million 2006 Institute of Medicine report on pharmaceutical regulation in the U.S. found major deficiencies in the FDA system for ensuring the safety of drugs on the American market. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Food_and_Drug_Administration

The FDA has been criticised for allowing the use of recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH) in dairy cows. rBGH-treated cows secrete higher levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) in their milk than do untreated cows. IGF-1 signalling is thought to play a role in sustaining the growth of some tumorshttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Food_and_Drug_Administration

Dr. Herbert L. Ley, Jr. In an interview to The New York Times, warned the public about the FDA’s inability to safeguard consumers. People were being misled, he believed “The thing that bugs me is that the people think the FDA is protecting them – it isn’t. What the FDA is doing and what the public thinks it’s doing are as different as night and day,” he said.Ley stated that the entire issue was about money, “pure and simple”.[50][51]

In a 2005 interview, Dr. David Graham, associate director of the FDA’s Office of Drug Safety, stated that “FDA is inherently biased in favor of the pharmaceutical industry. It views industry as its client, whose interests it must represent and advance. It views its primary mission as approving as many drugs it can, regardless of whether the drugs are safe or needed”[53][54] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Food_and_Drug_Administration

It also has been shown that oftentimes, the FDA expert advisory panels had direct financial interests in the drugs or products being evaluated.[57] Former Editor of The New England Journal of Medicine, Marcia Angell, has stated that “It’s time to take the Food and Drug Administration back from the drug companies https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Food_and_Drug_Administration

‘We knew there were payoffs,” said Roy McKnight, Mylan’s 68-year-old chairman. ”We knew we were being pushed back behind other companies’ applications and discriminated against.” Added Milan Puskar, the company’s 54-year-old president: ”We had to blow the whistle on the F.D.A. The F.D.A. generic division was just totally out of control. The industry was going to fall apart if we allowed the situation to continue.” https://www.nytimes.com/1989/09/10/business/exposing-the-fda.html

Critics of the 1992 Prescription Drug User Fee Act argue that industry funding of the drug review and approval process gives pharmaceutical companies, and their lobbying arm, PhRMA, too much… https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/prescription/hazard/independent.html

These sometimes create incentives (for drug firms and their employees) that conflict with the development of knowledge, drug safety, the promotion of public health, and innovation. https://ethics.harvard.edu/pharmaceutical-industry-institutional-corruption-and-public-health

Lies and Deception How the FDA Does Not Protect Your Best Interests. …  https://smart-publications.com/articles/lies-and-deception-how-the-fda-does-not-protect-your-best-interests/

newreport from two researchers at the Oregon Health and Science University, published in the journal The BMJ, suggests many of these medical reviewers go on to work for the drug companies they oversaw while working for the government. https://time.com/4510025/fda-drug-companies-pharmaceutical-industry-medical-reviewers/

More than a quarter of the Food and Drug Administration employees who approved cancer and hematology drugs from 2001 through 2010 left the agency and now work or consult for pharmaceutical industry https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/09/28/495694559/a-look-at-how-the-revolving-door-spins-from-fda-to-industry

The agency, whose responsibilities include making sure that prescription drugs sold in the United States are safe and effective, receives almost three-quarters of its funding for that work from drug makers. https://www.pogo.org/investigation/2016/12/fda-depends-on-industry-funding-money-comes-with-strings-attached/

If drug companies merely wrote the checks, there might be less cause for concern. Indeed, many federal agencies collect user fees. However, at the FDA, as a study by the Institute of Medicine has observed, the corporate money comes with “strings that are attached.”

Drug and Medical Device Companies Have Outsized Influence on FDA. $700 million in lobbying https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/drug-and-medical-device-com

Feb 13, 2021

Telegony: Your Future Children Could Look Like Your Ex, According To Science

A theory that scientists have been trying to test on flies, and named by German biologist August Weissman in the 1800s, telegony claims that when a sperm manages to reach the uterus, it might fertilize immature ovums, after which it is absorbed by the woman’s organism. Then, after a new mate arrives, this old genetic code might be responsible for the baby to have some of your ex’s features.

With a long tradition that can be traced all the way back to Aristotle, it wasn’t until 1820 when the first scientific articulation of telegony was formulated. Some evidence was documented by the Royal Society of London, when Count Morton confirmed two horse offspring had features of the mother’s old sexual partner.

So, telegony was all but dismissed in the 20th century. However, something happened very recently that turned this whole debate on its head. Evolutionary ecologists A. J. Crean and colleagues reported a seemingly telegonic phenomenon in a fly, a member of the species Telostylinus angusticollis.

“As a first step towards disentangling whether the effect is borne by the sperm itself or by accessory-gland products (ACPs) in the seminal fluid, we mated females initially to a male in high or low condition and then re-mated the female to a new male in high or low condition two weeks later. Interestingly, offspring size and viability were determined by the condition of the first male, with no effect of the condition of the second mate. Genetic tests confirm this result holds even when the second male is the biological father of the offspring. These findings suggest the paternal effect is mediated by ACPs, and provide a compelling case for reassessing the possibility of telegony as a valid phenomenon.” — Crean, Kopps, and Bonduriansky.

One year earlier, Henan University of Science and Technology in Xiangxiang, China, published an article on Gene, in which scientist Yongsheng Liu assured there are several considerations that support the theory of telegony. For example, the hundreds of sperm cells that reach a uterus but fail to fertilize an ovum are regularly absorbed by the woman’s body, thus modifying the baby’s DNA.

Microchimerism of male origin

Male microchimerism, the presence of a small number of male cells, in women has been attributed to prior pregnancies. However, male microchimerism has also been reported in women with only daughters, in nulliparous women and prepubertal girls suggesting that other sources of male microchimerism must exist. We speculate that sexual intercourse may be important but other sources of male cells likely exist in young girls.

Feb 13, 2021

St John’s Wort – similarly effective as standard antidepressants with fewer side-effects

A total of 29 trials (5489 patients) including 18 comparisons with placebo and 17 comparisons with synthetic standard antidepressants met the inclusion criteria. Results of placebo-controlled trials showed marked heterogeneity. In nine larger trials the combined response rate ratio (RR) for hypericum extracts compared with placebo was 1.28 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10 to 1.49) and from nine smaller trials was 1.87 (95% CI, 1.22 to 2.87). Results of trials comparing hypericum extracts and standard antidepressants were statistically homogeneous. Compared with tri- or tetracyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), respectively, RRs were 1.02 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.15; 5 trials) and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.11; 12 trials). Both in placebo-controlled trials and in comparisons with standard antidepressants, trials from German-speaking countries reported findings more favourable to hypericum. Patients given hypericum extracts dropped out of trials due to adverse effects less frequently than those given older antidepressants (odds ratio (OR) 0.24; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.46) or SSRIs (OR 0.53, 95% CI, 0.34-0.83).

Authors’ conclusions: The available evidence suggests that the hypericum extracts tested in the included trials a) are superior to placebo in patients with major depression; b) are similarly effective as standard antidepressants; c) and have fewer side effects than standard antidepressants. The association of country of origin and precision with effects sizes complicates the interpretation.

Jul 23, 2020

Child abuse is 40 times more likely when single parents find new partners – Eradicating child abuse in America would reduce the overall rate of depression by more than half, alcoholism by two‐thirds, and suicide, serious drug abuse, and domestic violence by three quarters.

“children of divorce – and later, remarriage – are twice as likely to academically, behaviorally and socially struggle as children of first-marriage families: About 20 to 25 percent struggle, compared with 10 percent, a range of research finds.”

They are also more likely to be hurt.

In their article “Child Abuse and Other Risks of Not Living with both Parents,” published in Ethology and Sociobiology, Martin Daly and Margo Wilson note: “If their parents find new partners, children are 40 times more likely than those who live with biological parents to be sexually or physically abused.” According to a Missouri-based study of children living in homes with unrelated adults, children are “nearly 50 times as likely to die of inflicted injuries as children living with two biological parents.” These are worrying statistics, both disturbing and scary.

 

Eradicating child abuse in America would reduce the overall rate of depression by more than half, alcoholism by two‐thirds, and suicide, serious drug abuse, and domestic violence by three quarters. It would also have a significantly positive effect on workplace performance, and vastly decrease the need for incarceration.

 

Jul 11, 2020

Teenage transgender row splits Sweden as dysphoria diagnoses soar by 1,500%

In the autumn of 2018, the Social Democrat-led government, under pressure from the gay, lesbian and transgender group RFSL, proposed a new law which would reduce the minimum age for sex reassignment medical care from 18 to 15, remove all need for parental consent, and allow children as young as 12 to change their legal gender.

Then in March last year, the backlash started. Christopher Gillberg, a psychiatrist at Gothenburg’s Sahlgrenska Academy, wrote an article in the Svenska Dagbladet newspaper warning that hormone treatment and surgery on children was “a big experiment” which risked becoming one of the country’s worst medical scandals.

In April, Uppdrag Granskning, an investigative TV programme, followed up with a documentary profiling a former trans man, Sametti, who regretted her irreversible treatment.

From Colin Wright

Feb 18, 2016

Eradicating child abuse in America would reduce the overall rate of depression by more than half, alcoholism by two‐thirds, and suicide, serious drug abuse, and domestic violence by three quarters. It would also have a significantly positive effect on workplace performance, and vastly decrease the need for incarceration.

Research of people with histories of caregiver abuse and neglect consistently demonstrates problems with concentration, anger, panic, depression, food intake, drugs, and sleep, as well as decreased Heart RateVariability, higher levels of stress hormones, and reduced or impaired immune response.

Traumatic life experiences during childhood and adolescence are far more common than expected. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that child maltreatment may be the most costly public health issue in the United States, Eradicating child abuse in America would reduce the overall rate of depression by more than half, alcoholism by two‐thirds, and suicide, serious drug abuse, and domestic violence by three quarters. It would also have a significantly positive effect on workplace performance, and vastly decrease the need for incarceration. The current practice of applying multiple distinct comorbid diagnoses to traumatized children prevents a comprehensive treatment approach. Approaching their problems from a framework of memories of discreet traumatic ignores the fact that the damage affects the brain’s neural circuitry and goes well beyond dealing with discrete painful events. Our great challenge is to learn to utilize the brain’s neuroplasticity to reorganize defective brain circuits.

Dec 2, 2020

Vitamin D reduced the risk of ICU admission 25-fold. Put another way, it eliminated 96% of the risk of ICU admission

50% of the control group (13 people) required admission to the ICU. Only 2% of those in the vitamin D group (one person) required admission to the ICU.

Expressed as relative risk, vitamin D reduced the risk of ICU admission 25-fold. Put another way, it eliminated 96% of the risk of ICU admission.

These results are consistent with the first observational study on vitamin D, which found that 96% of severe and critical cases occurred at 25(OH)D under 30 ng/mL, whereas 97.5% of mild cases had 25(OH)D above 30 ng/mL.

This study couldn’t measure the effect on mortality, but all two deaths were in the control group and the near abolition of ICU risk suggests that death would also be nearly abolished. This is consistent with the second observational study finding that only 4% of those with vitamin D status above 30 ng/mL died, while 88% of those with vitamin D status at 20-30 ng/mL died, and 99% of those with vitamin D status lower than that died.

This was statistically significant at p<0.001, and the 95% confidence interval was 0.002-0.17. This means that the probability of observing differences this large or greater if there is no true effect of vitamin D is less than one in a thousand, and that the probability is 95% that the true effect lies somewhere between an 83% and a 99.8% reduction in the odds of ICU admission.

The vitamin D was provided as oral calcifediol, also known as calcidiol, 25(OH)D, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D. This is a metabolite of vitamin D that our livers make. It is is the principle form of vitamin D that circulates in the blood, and we use it as a measure of vitamin D status.

Traces of 25(OH)D occur in food, and it is five times as potent as vitamin D. As described on page 255 of the 1997 DRI Report, 25(OH)D is given an international unit (IU) value that equates it to vitamin D. Whereas one microgram (mcg) of vitamin D is 40 IU, 1 mcg of 25(OH)D is 200 IU.

The treatment in this RCT was soft capsules of 532 mcg 25(OH)D on day 1 of admission to the hospital, followed by 266 mcg on days 3 and 7, and then 266 mcg once a week until discharge, ICU admission, or death.

This is equivalent to 106,400 IU vitamin D on day 1, 53,200 IU on days 3 and 7, and 53,200 IU weekly thereafter. If this were given as daily doses, it would be the equivalent of 30,400 per day for the first week, followed by a maintenance dose of 7,600 IU per day.

The vitamin D status of the patients was not measured. However, the average vitamin D status in this region of Spain during the time of year in which the study was conducted is 16 ng/mL. A single dose of 100,000 IU vitamin D tends to raise a 25(OH)D of 10 ng/mL into the 20-30 ng/mL range. My suspicion is that the bolus dosing in the first week brought the patients’ vitamin D status into the 30-40 ng/mL range by the end of the week, and that most of the healing took place in the circa 40 ng/mL range.

Mar 4, 2015

Scientific studies compilation showing adverse reactions of routine vaccines – dtap, polio, HPV, MMR

Vaccination before 1 year of age was associated with increased odds of developmental delays (OR = 2.18, 95% CI 1.47–3.24), asthma (OR = 4.49, 95% CI 2.04–9.88) and ear infections (OR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.63–2.78). In a quartile analysis, subjects were grouped by number of vaccine doses received in the first year of life. Higher odds ratios were observed in Quartiles 3 and 4 (where more vaccine doses were received) for all four health conditions considered, as compared to Quartile 1. In a temporal analysis, developmental delays showed a linear increase as the age cut-offs increased from 6 to 12 to 18 to 24 months of age (ORs = 1.95, 2.18, 2.92 and 3.51, respectively). Slightly higher ORs were also observed for all four health conditions when time permitted for a diagnosis was extended from ⩾ 3 years of age to ⩾ 5 years of age. Source: Analysis of health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children: Developmental delays, asthma, ear infections and gastrointestinal disorders

 

Lots of studies: http://www.educate4theinjured.org/#!the-factsscience/cc2d

Huge list of studies: https://therefurbishedrogue.wordpress.com/2013/05/03/my-list-of-peer-reviewed-vaccine-research/

List of studies that found autism link: https://www.scribd.com/doc/220807175/86-Research-Papers-Supporting-the-Vaccine-Autism-Link

Lots of research and studies from dr. seneff: http://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/

More studies: http://adventuresinautism.blogspot.ca/2007/06/no-evidence-of-any-link.html

http://barbfeick.com/vaccinations/allergy/405%20-%20meaningless_statistics.html

Inteviews with drs Suzanne Humphries and Tetyana Obukhanych http://jeffreydachmd.com/2014/03/dissolving-illusions-book-review-jeffrey-dach-md/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFQQOv-Oi6U Dr. Suzanne Humphries Lecture on vaccines and health FULL PART ONE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Bc6WX33SuE Dr Theresa Deisher – Worldwide Autism Epidemic & Human Fetal Manufactured Contaminated Vaccines

Explanation of terms: Relative Risk RR: http://practice.sph.umich.edu/micphp/epicentral/relative_risk.php Odds ratio OR: http://practice.sph.umich.edu/micphp/epicentral/odds_ratio.php

 

Doctors and Scientists with Concerns About Vaccines

http://www.greatergoodmovie.org/news-views/doctors-and-scientists-with-concerns-about-vaccines/

A Stanford professor has found that the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has not lived up its original goals of providing “simple justice” to children injured by vaccines. Lengthy delays and an adversarial tone characterize the program. http://news.stanford.edu/news/2015/july/vaccine-court-engstrom-070615.html

First They Came for the Anti-Vaxxers

http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2015/april/23/first-they-came-for-the-anti-vaxxers/

Hib Haemophilus influenzae type b

  • Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine on type 1 diabetes: The relative risk is 1.26 (26% higher risk) at 7 years. The rise in diabetes, just one potential adverse effect, exceeds the benefit of the vaccine, which has been estimated to prevent seven deaths and 7-26 cases of severe disability per 100 000 children immunised.2 Even the difference in cases of diabetes between the groups receiving four doses and one dose exceeds the mean expected benefit. Temporal changes in the incidence of diabetes do not explain the differences since there were an extra 31 cases of type 1 diabetes per 100 000 children aged 5-10, and the incidence of diabetes in this group had been stable for about 10 years before this.3 Furthermore, sharp rises in diabetes have been recorded in the United States4 and the United Kingdom5 after the introduction of the haemophilus vaccine.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1116914/
  • We estimated that the 4 doses of the hemophilus influenza B vaccine increased the risk of IDDM, relative risk 1.17, P<0.05, based on 10 years of follow up of a large clinical trial (2). Our data indicated the risk of vaccine induced IDDM exceeded the benefit by 3 to 1. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/108/6/e112.short/reply#pediatrics_el_281
  • The relative risks (95% confidence intervals) of asthma were: 1.18 (1.02 to 1.36) for Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib); (18% higher risk of asthma)
    http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/439840
  • The greatest increase in type 1 diabetes has occurred in children aged under 4 (fig 2),1-2 which coincides with the period when H influenzae type b vaccine was introduced in the mid-1980s. This should raise our suspicions as to whether the vaccine could be responsible for this increase. Karvonen et al have dismissed the data as not being significant; however, the impact on the lives of a further 58 cases per 100 000 children at the age of 10 who will have to learn how to deal with a lifelong chronic disease such as type 1 diabetes should not be trivialised.

MMR – Measles, Mumps, Rubella

Graph of falling measles rates in Canada before vaccination: http://i.imgur.com/k6qs6tO.png

  • The apparent paradox is that as measles immunization rates rise to high levels in a population, measles becomes a disease of immunized persons We found 18 reports of measles outbreaks in very highly immunized school populations where 71% to 99.8% of students were immunized against measles. Despite these high rates of immunization, 30% to 100% (mean, 77%) of all measles cases in these outbreaks occurred in previously immunized students. In our hypothetical school model, after more than 95% of schoolchildren are immunized against measles, the majority of measles cases occur in appropriately immunized children.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8053748
  • ‘poor responders,’ who were re-immunized and developed poor or low-level antibody responses only to lose detectable antibody and develop measles on exposure 2–5 years later.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9463343
  • Two hundred fifty-two confirmed cases of diabetes and 768 matched controls met the study eligibility criteria. The OR (95% confidence interval) for the association with type 1 diabetes was 1.36 (0.70–2.63) for measles-mumps-rubella,
    http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/108/6/e112.short
  • RE: PREVIOUS STUDY ^ We also found the incidence of IDDM rose in Finland about 60% percent following the introduction of the MMR vaccine in 1982 and the Hemophilus vaccine in 1986 (3). DeStefano’s data on the combined odds ratio of the hemophilus vaccine and the MMR vaccine (1.14*1.36=1.55 OR) support our conclusion that vaccines can explain the 60% rise. DeStefano erroneous concludes his findings do not support our data and conclusions. Clearly it is not in the public interest to deny that vaccines can explain the rise in IDDM. Case control studies like DeStefano’s and others also do not adjust for the confounding effects of several different vaccines that can have opposing effects on the development of IDDM. For example patients born in 1994 may have received the hepatitis B vaccine at birth, which is associated with a decreased risk, but also have received a HiB vaccine which is associated with an increased risk. By contrast our studies have involved large cohorts which only differed by a single vaccine. We have also found that the increased risk of IDDM associated with most vaccines does not occur until three years after immunization. A finding supported by published literature There may not have been sufficient time of follow up for DeStefano to see an increased risk of IDDM with certain vaccines.http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/108/6/e112.short/reply#pediatrics_el_281
  • The design and reporting of safety outcomes in MMR vaccine studies, both pre- and post-marketing, are largely inadequate. The evidence of adverse events following immunisation with the MMR vaccine cannot be separated from its role in preventing the target diseases.
    A significant risk of association with febrile seizures and MMR exposure during the two previous weeks (RR 1.10; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.15) (10% more febrile seizures) Increased risk of febrile seizure has also been observed in children aged between 12 to 23 months (409% increase) (relative incidence (RI) 4.09; 95% CI 3.1 to 5.33) and children aged 12 to 35 months (568% increase) (RI 5.68; 95% CI 2.31 to 13.97) within six to 11 days after exposure to MMR vaccine. An increased risk of thrombocytopenic purpura within six weeks after MMR immunisation in children aged 12 to 23 months was assessed in one case-control study (630% increase) (RR 6.3; 95% CI 1.3 to 30.1) and in one small self controlled case series (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 5.38; 95% CI 2.72 to 10.62). Increased risk of thrombocytopenic purpura within six weeks after MMR exposure was also assessed in one other case-control study involving 2311 children and adolescents between one month and 18 years (odds ratio (OR) 2.4
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22336803
  • This preliminary study found that acetaminophen use after measles-mumps-rubella vaccination was associated with autistic disorder.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18445737
  • A 1996 study in Africa found higher rates of allergies among those who had been vaccinated against measles than among those who had survived the disease. The study concluded that “(m)easles infection may prevent the development of atopy in African children.”
  • In addition, over 90% of MMR antibody-positive autistic sera were also positive for MBPautoantibodies, suggesting a causal association between MMR and brain autoimmunity in autism.
    http://www.icdrc.org/documents/Abstract%20702%20Abnormal%20Measles%20Serology%20and%20Autoimmunity.pdf
  • Stemming from this evidence, we suggest that an inappropriate antibody response to MMR, specifically the measles component thereof, might be related to pathogenesis of autism.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12145534
  • “We were disappointed by our inability to identify effectiveness studies with population or clinical outcomes. Given the existence of documented elimination of targeted diseases in large population by means of mass immunisation campaigns however, we have no reason to doubt the effectiveness of MMR.” So we believe it, because we all saw it happen, not because there is a study which shows it to be true. http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/vaccine-safety-myth
  • Mortality was significantly lower in children vaccinated at 6-8 months than at 9-11 months
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8257884
  • Children having received measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination showed an increased risk of rhinoconjunctivitis
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16387585/
  • According to the whistleblowers’ court documents, Merck’s misconduct was far-ranging: It “failed to disclose that its mumps vaccine was not as effective as Merck represented, (ii) used improper testing techniques, (iii) manipulated testing methodology, (iv) abandoned undesirable test results, (v) falsified test data,etc
    http://philadelphia.legalexaminer.com/fda-prescription-drugs/massive-fraud-in-merck-mmr-vaccine-testing/
  • According to the whistleblowers’ court documents, Merck’s misconduct was far-ranging: It “failed to disclose that its mumps vaccine was not as effective as Merck represented, (ii) used improper testing techniques, (iii) manipulated testing methodology, (iv) abandoned undesirable test results, (v) falsified test data, (vi) failed to adequately investigate and report the diminished efficacy of its mumps vaccine, (vii) falsely verified that each manufacturing lot of mumps vaccine would be as effective as identified in the labeling, (viii) falsely certified the accuracy of applications filed with the FDA, (ix) falsely certified compliance with the terms of the CDC purchase contract, (x) engaged in the fraud and concealment describe herein for the purpose of illegally monopolizing the U.S. market for mumps vaccine, (xi) mislabeled, misbranded, and falsely certified its mumps vaccine, and (xii) engaged in the other acts described herein to conceal the diminished efficacy of the vaccine the government was purchasing.”
    http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/lawrence-solomon/merck-whistleblowers_b_5881914.html

Effectiveness and are the anti-vaxxers to blame?

…discovered something truly disturbing about the MMR vaccine: it leads to detectable measles infection in the vast majority of those who receive it. Researchers analyzed urine samples from newly MMR vaccinated 15-month-old children and young adults and reported their eye-opening results as following:

  • Measles virus RNA was detected in 10 of 12 children during the 2-week sampling period.
  • In some cases, measles virus RNA was detected as early as 1 day or as late as 14 days after the children were vaccinated.
  • Measles virus RNA was also detected in the urine samples from all four of the young adults between 1 and 13 days after vaccination.
  • A history of prior vaccination is not always associated with immunity nor with the presence of specific antibodies. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3168353
  • An outbreak of measles in a highly immunised population
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7841251
  • Major measles epidemic in the region of Quebec despite a 99% vaccine coverage
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1884314
  • an outbreak of 84 measles cases occurred at a college in Colorado in which over 98 percent of students had documentation of adequate measles immunity
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1405017/
  • We conclude that outbreaks of measles can occur in secondary schools, even when more than 99 percent of the students have been vaccinated and more than 95 percent are immune.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3821823
  • an audit of immunization records at the schools in Browning, Montana, where most of the cases occurred, showed that 98.7% of students were appropriately vaccinated.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3618578
  • “The reported coverage of the measles-rubella (MR) or measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine is greater than 99.0% in Zhejiang province. However, the incidence of measles, mumps, and rubella remains high.” despite the recent measles outbreaks 93.6% of them were seropositive for measles antibodies
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3618578
  • The highest risk of association with aseptic meningitis was observed within the third week after immunisation with Urabe-containing MMR (risk ratio (RR) 14.28; 95% confidence interval (CI) from 7.93 to 25.71) and within the third (RR 22.5; 95% CI 11.8 to 42.9) or fifth (RR 15.6; 95% CI 10.3 to 24.2) weeks after immunisation with the vaccine prepared with the Leningrad-Zagreb strain. A significant risk of association with febrile seizures and MMR exposure during the two previous weeks (RR 1.10; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.15) was assessed in one large person-time cohort study involving 537,171 children aged between three months and five year of age. Increased risk of febrile seizure has also been observed in children aged between 12 to 23 months (relative incidence (RI) 4.09; 95% CI 3.1 to 5.33) and children aged 12 to 35 months (RI 5.68; 95% CI 2.31 to 13.97) within six to 11 days after exposure to MMR vaccine. An increased risk of thrombocytopenic purpura within six weeks after MMR immunisation in children aged 12 to 23 months was assessed in one case-control study (RR 6.3; 95% CI 1.3 to 30.1) and in one small self controlled case series (incidence rate ratio
  • Why Japan banned MMR vaccine: Of the 3,969 medical compensation claims relating to vaccines in the last 30 years, a quarter had been made by those badly affected by the combined measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, they say. The triple jab was banned in Japan in 1993 after 1.8 million children had been given two types of MMR and a record number developed non-viral meningitis and other adverse reactions. Official figures show there were three deaths while eight children were left with permanent handicaps ranging from damaged hearing and blindness to loss of control of limbs.
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-17509/Why-Japan-banned-MMR-vaccine.html
  • Mumps: In 2010, two virologists filed a federal lawsuit against Merck, their former employer, alleging the vaccine maker engaged in improper testing and data falsification to artificially inflate the efficacy rating of their mumps vaccine. ‘Merck should not be permitted to raise as one of its principal defenses that its vaccine has a high efficacy, which is accurately represented on the product’s label, but then refuse to answer what it claims that efficacy actually is,’ the letter said. Recently, 41 students at Harvard University came down with mumps and, according to the Public Health department in Cambridge, every single one of those students had been vaccinated.4 Four other campuses in Boston are also starting to see cases, as have four universities in Indiana. About 13 cases of mumps have also cropped up in California. Meanwhile, death from mumps is “exceedingly rare” according to the CDC,6 and no one has died from mumps during any of the recent outbreaks.
    http://www.thevaccinereaction.org/2016/05/mumps-being-spread-by-and-among-vaccinated-people/

Measles treatment:

  • There was a 64% reduction in the risk of mortality in children who were given two doses of 200,000 IU of vitamin A as compared to placebo. Two doses of water based vitamin A were associated with a 81% reduction in risk of mortality as compared to 48% seen in two doses of oil based preparation. Two doses of oil and water based vitamin A were associated with a 82% reduction in the risk of mortality
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11869601
  • Measles: A study in the American Journal of Public Health, “Measles mortality in the United States 1971-1975,” found the measles death rate to be almost 10 times higher among families whose median income was less than $5,000 than among families whose income exceeded a modest $10,000. Families outside metropolitan areas, who tended to have poor healthcare, had three times the death rate. Measles didn’t only discriminate by income — in another study, Barkin found that children with underlying diseases were particularly vulnerable, and that the “majority of this group were physically or mentally retarded, or both.” The realization that measles was selective in whom it killed led Barkin to emphasize that vulnerable populations, rather than the general population, should be targeted for measles vaccination….. vaccinated mothers have little antibody to pass on — only about one-quarter as much as mothers protected by natural measles….. in recent years, the new vaccination regime, too, has been failing, with widespread outbreaks again occurring, including among those who have received the recommended dose and especially among infants too young to be vaccinated, and thus unprotected because their mothers had been vaccinated. Now health experts, scrambling to find solutions, are suggesting numerous reforms, including earlier child vaccinations and second doses for adults..[source]
  • Vitamin A: 50% lower chance of getting measles with vitamin A. reported a 24% reduction in all cause mortality (rate ratio=0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.69 to 0.83). Seven trials reported a 28% reduction in mortality associated with diarrhoea (0.72, 0.57 to 0.91). Vitamin A supplementation was associated with a reduced incidence of diarrhoea (0.85, 0.82 to 0.87) and measles (0.50, 0.37 to 0.67) and a reduced prevalence of vision problems, including night blindness (0.32, 0.21 to 0.50) and xerophthalmia (0.31, 0.22 to 0.45).
    http://www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d5094
  • Hussey (Hussey 1990) showed a statistically significant reduction in hospital stay by almost five days in the vitamin A treated group…. there was almost six days reduction in duration of pneumonia in the vitamin A treated group…..statistically significant reduction in duration of diarrhoea by almost two days in the vitamin A treated group…..Coutsoudis (Coutsoudis 1991) found that the vitamin A group had a 1.5 times better chance of complete clinical recovery than the placebo group, which was statistically significant
    http://www.measlesrubellainitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Vitamin-A-for-measles-children.pdf

 

Hepatitis B

Cases of hepititis: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3290915/figure/F1/ (kids are 0.1-1 in 100,000) Half of all people with hepatitis B do not feel sick at all. But they can still pass the disease to others. Some will become carriers and have the virus in their blood and other body fluids (like semen) for the rest of their lives.
In other cases, hepatitis B makes people very sick. These people can become sick with fever, fatigue, loss of appetite, and yellow skin and eyes (jaundice). The illness can last for weeks or months. Most people will get better and become immune (protected from the illness) for life. A small number become carriers. The younger you are when you become infected, the more likely you are to become infected for life.
Carriers can pass the virus to other people and are at high risk for getting cirrhosis (liver disease), liver failure, and cancer of the liver. Some carriers need a liver transplant and others die of their liver disease.

http://www.vaccines.net/toppage1.htm Congress Told Hepatitis B Vaccine Linked to Rise in Diabetes.

Classen has published data from both New Zealand and Italy that the Hepatitis B vaccine, when given after 2 months of life, is associated with an approximately 50% increased risk of diabetes. The CDC only published part of their data on the hepatitis B vaccine. The CDC found the hepatitis B vaccine was associated with an overall decreased risk of diabetes (relative risk 0.92) which is consistent with a large per cent of those vaccinated receiving the vaccine at birth. The CDC however found that those immunized starting after 2 months of life were at a 60% increased risk of developing diabetes than those immunized starting in the first month of life (.88/.52). The CDC’s hepatitis B vaccine data is thus also consistent with Classen’s finding. The CDC’s study and analysis suffered from some obvious limitations and flaws. The CDC studied only 260 diabetics and 780 controls while Dr. Classen’s studies typically have involved 100,000 people or more. The CDC’s study did not compensate for the interaction between the two different vaccines since people received both the hepatitis B vaccine and the hemophilus vaccine while Classen studied these vaccines.  In 1997 the CDC also presented an analysis on the hepatitis B vaccine, also from the same HMO data source, but did not use either “fudge” factor. In this study the hepatitis B vaccine, when given after 8 weeks of life, was associated with a 90% increased risk of diabetes. The fact that the CDC manipulates similar data in different years using different “fudge” factors has raised suspicion that their analysis is severely flawed and their interpretations of the data should be viewed with caution.separately. http://www.cmu.edu/CSR/case_studies/vaccine_diabetes_yes.html

  • “The results of this large prospective longitudinal study show that 42% of babies born of HBsAg-positive mothers develop occult HBV infection, which is not prevented by administration of recombinant HBV vaccine to the new- born.” No historical studies claiming vaccine efficacy have ever actually tested for the persistent presence of viral DNA. In fact, most have assessed only for the presence of antibodies.
    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvh.12102/abstract and http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/mother-s-decision-first-shot-hepatitis-b
  • The analyses include 163 cases of MS and 1,604 controls. The OR of MS for vaccination within 3 years before the index date compared to no vaccination was 3.1 (310% increase in MS) These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that immunization with the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine is associated with an increased risk of MS, and challenge the idea that the relation between hepatitis B vaccination and risk of MS is well understood.
    http://www.neurology.org/content/63/5/838.abstract
  • When the analysis was restricted to subjects compliant with vaccination, HB vaccine exposure >3 years before index date was associated with an increased trend (1.50; 0.93–2.43), essentially from the Engerix B vaccine (1.74; 1.03–2.95). The OR was particularly elevated for this brand in patients with confirmed multiple sclerosis (2.77; 1.23–6.24). However, the Engerix B vaccine appears to increase this risk, particularly for confirmed multiple sclerosis, in the longer term. Our results require confirmation in future studies.
    http://www.neurology.org/content/72/10/873.abstract
  • Although vaccines harbor a major contribution to public health in the modern era, in rare cases they may be associated with autoimmune phenomena such as transverse myelitis.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19880568
  • Hepatitis B vaccinated children had an unadjusted odds ratio of 2.57 (2.57 times higher) and age-adjusted odds ratio of 1.53 for liver problems compared with non-hepatitis B vaccinated children
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10230847
  • The relative risks (95% confidence intervals) of asthma were: 1.20 (1.13 to 1.27) for hepatitis B vaccine. (20% higher risk of asthma)
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12182372
  • This primate model provides a possible means of assessing adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes from neonatal Th-containing hepatitis B vaccine exposure, particularly in infants of lower GA or BW. The mechanisms underlying these effects and the requirements for Th requires further study.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20711932
  • study supports an association between increasing organic-mercury exposure from Thimerosal-containing childhood vaccines and the subsequent risk of specific delays in development among males and females.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4215490/
  • demonstrated delayed acquisition of neurodevelopmental reflexes in the thimerosol (ethylmercury-forming preservative) Hep B vaccinated group
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20711932
  • Children younger than 14 are three times more likely to die or suffer adverse reactions after receiving hepatitis B vaccines than to catch the disease Jane. M. Orient, M.D., Executive Director of AAPS According to a recent federal government study, serious adverse events after the vaccine – including 48 deaths – are reported three times as frequently as cases of hepatitis B in children under the age of 14. “We suspect the adverse reactions are vastly underreported, as formal long-term studies of vaccine safety have not been completed,” says Dr. Orient. “We find it shocking that government health officials cavalierly dismiss reports of serious adverse vaccine effects as coincidental and that school officials ignore them altogether.”
    http://www.aapsonline.org/press/hepbpre.htm
  • We found no RCTs that assessed the effects of hepatitis B vaccine during pregnancy for preventing infant infection. Consequently, this review cannot provide guidance for clinical practice in this area. However, it does identify the need for well-designed randomized clinical trials for the effect of hepatitis B vaccine during pregnancy on the incidence of infant infection and adverse effects.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21412913

 

Varicella – chicken pox

when the varicella vaccine came out, the WHO and CDC knew that it would likely increase shingles cases. Shingles is re-emergence of the varicella virus in the body, but periodic exposure to environmental varicella actually keeps the immune system “up to date” in order to stop shingles.This is one reason why Britain refused to vaccinate against varicella.<–some guy

Vaccinating against varicella is thought to actually increase the incidence of shingles. In the UK vaccination is not done because introduction of a routine childhood vaccination might drive up the age at which those who are non‐immune get the illness (chickenpox tends to be more severe the older you are), and the incidence of shingles may increase. The United Kingdom is waiting to see what happens in countries where vaccination is routine.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2563790/

  • The OR (95% confidence interval) for the association with type 1 diabetes was 1.16[16% higher rates of type 1 diabetes after varicella vaccine] (0.72–1.89) for varicella vaccine
    http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/108/6/e112.short
  • ∼1 in every 5 vaccinated persons may develop varicella disease, also known as breakthrough disease. studies have suggested that a second dose of varicella vaccine could provide increased protection against varicella, thus reducing the risk of breakthrough disease by 3-fold
    http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/197/Supplement_2/S127.long
  • Varicella was reported in 84 children of the 880 children vaccination coverage was 97%, This outbreak is the first to document varicella in both 1- and 2-dose vaccine recipients; both groups had mild disease. The vaccine effectiveness of 1 and 2 doses were similar. All 2-dose recipients and 80% of 1-dose recipients reported having 50 or fewer skin lesions.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19593254
  • Chickenpox vaccines contain weakened live VZV, which may cause latent (dormant) infection. The vaccine-strain VZV can reactivate later in life and cause shingles. However, the risk of getting shingles from vaccine-strain VZV after chickenpox vaccination is much lower than getting shingles after natural infection with wild-type VZV. People who get chickenpox vaccines can spread the vaccine-strain VZV to others. But, this is very rare.
    http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/vaccines/varicella/
  • A single episode of WTVZV in childhood is associated with decreased odds ratio (OR) of developing AD (conditional logistic regression; OR, 0.55;
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20624648/
  • As vaccination rates have increased, the majority of varicella cases now occur among vaccinated persons. Cases of varicella in vaccinated persons (i.e., breakthrough cases) are generally much milder
    http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/surv-manual/chpt17-varicella.html
  • re-exposure to varicella-zoster virus via contact with children offered as much as a 20 per cent reduction in risk for herpes zoster (shingles). in 2002, other researchers reported that exposure to the chickenpox virus experienced by adults living with children prior to the introduction of the vaccine was “highly protective against zoster (Incidence ratio=0.75, 95% CI, 0.63–0.89),” and they too predicted that “mass varicella vaccination [would be] expected to cause a major epidemic of herpes-zoster, affecting more than 50% of those aged 10–44 years at the introduction of vaccination. “Universal varicella vaccination has failed to provide long-term protection from VZV [shingles] disease.8
    http://www.thevaccinereaction.org/2016/04/chickenpox-vaccine-may-increase-shingles-risk/

Diphtheria Pertussis Tetanus – DPT

  • Tetanus Canada: Between 1990 and 2010, the number of cases reported annually ranged from 1 to 10, with an average of 4 per year. During this period, persons 60 years of age and older accounted for 48% of the cases, of which 59% were males. No cases were reported among neonates. [source]
  • Among 11, 531 children who received at least 4 doses of DPT, the risk of asthma was reduced to (1/2) in children whose first dose of DPT was delayed by more than 2 months. the association was greater with delays in all of the first 3 doses. The mechanism for this phenomenon requires further research.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18207561/
  • A study in New Zealand found a higher rate of asthma among those who had been vaccinated (Kemp et al, 1997); Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Study in the US showed that children vaccinated with DTP or Tetanus vaccines were twice as likely to develop asthma as unvaccinated children (Hurwitz and Morgenstern, 2000)
  • Diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine administered simultaneously with measles vaccine is associated with increased morbidity and poor growth in girls.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21093496
  • we found the SIDS mortality rate in the period zero to three days following DTP to be 7.3 times that in the period beginning 30 days after immunization == suggest that DTP immunization is not a significant factor in the occurrence of SIDS.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1647245/ == http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3493477
  • We found that immunity does not even persist into early childhood in some cases. We also observed that DPT vaccine does not fully protect children against the level of clinical disease defined by WHO. Our results indicate that children ages 5-6 years and possibly younger, ages 2-3 years, play a role as silent reservoirs in the transmission of pertussis in the community. More studies are needed to find the immunologic basis of protection against infection and colonization and thus an effective way to eradicate pertussis.
    http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/6/5/00-0512_article
  • Pertussis: unvaccinated ” are not the driving force behind the large scale outbreaks or epidemics.” http://www.cdc.gov/pertussis/about/faqs.html

 

Polio

In over 95% of the time, polio presents with the following symptoms: slight fever, malaise, headache, sore throat, and vomiting.  These start 3-5 days after exposure and recovery is 24-72 hours with a result of lifetime immunity. The remaining 3% was non-paralytic polio.  This presented for 2-10 days as high fever, severe headache, stiff neck, hyperesthesia/parasthesia in extremities and some asymmetrical limb weakness.  Take this list of symptoms to your doctor and you will probably get a label of meningitis, not polio.

 

Flu Shots

 

HPV

  • We documented here the evidence of the potential of the HPV vaccine to trigger a life-disabling autoimmune condition. The increasing number of similar reports of post HPV vaccine-linked autoimmunity and the uncertainty of long-term clinical benefits of HPV vaccination are a matter of public health that warrants further rigorous inquiry.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23902317
  • For example, while the world’s leading medical authorities state that HPV vaccines are an important cervical cancer prevention tool, clinical trials show no evidence that HPV vaccination can protect against cervical cancer. Similarly, contrary to claims that cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women worldwide, existing data show that this only applies to developing countries. In the Western world cervical cancer is a rare disease with mortality rates that are several times lower than the rate of reported serious adverse reactions (including deaths) from HPV vaccination. Future vaccination policies should adhere more rigorously to evidence-based medicine and ethical guidelines for informed consent.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22188159
  • Dr. Diane Harper, a lead developer of the controversial Gardasil vaccine believes this vaccine, which is being recommended for teens and pre-teens to combat cervical cancer, is less effective than the common Pap smear, and that it may harm more children than it helps. “Parents and women must know that deaths occurred,” she stated in arguing that parents need to know that they could be subjecting their children to needless risks. “The benefit to public health is nothing, there is no reduction in cervical cancers, they are just postponed” Dr. Harper joins a number of consumer watchdogs, vaccine safety advocates, and parents who question the vaccine’s risk-versus-benefit profile.
    http://www.cbsnews.com/news/gardasil-researcher-speaks-out/
  • For example, the claim that HPV vaccination will result in approximately 70% reduction of cervical cancers is made despite the fact that the clinical trials data have not demonstrated to date that the vaccines have actually prevented a single case of cervical cancer (let alone cervical cancer death), nor that the current overly optimistic surrogate marker-based extrapolations are justified. Likewise, the notion that HPV vaccines have an impressive safety profile is only supported by highly flawed design of safety trials and is contrary to accumulating evidence from vaccine safety surveillance databases and case reports which continue to link HPV vaccination to serious adverse outcomes
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23016780

 

VAERS reporting system – flawed

Indeed, one study found that while 68% of cases of vaccine-associated polio were reported, only 4% of MMR-associated thrombocytopenia were reported. An earlier study found that only 1% of adverse events following prescription drug use were reported. And in 1994, a survey found that only 18% of 159 doctors’ offices made reports when children suffered serious health problems following vaccination. In New York, this number was one out of 40.

 

Vaccines and Autism

Dr. Stephanie Seneff discusses the potential connection between vaccines and autism – MMR – contains glutamate which is toxic to autistic kids, goes to the brain. After 2002 autism rates rose because of glyphosate. Glyphosate changes aluminum molecule to a neutral one which is why it bypasses the gut and goes to brain also how this affects so many other health problems: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3P6wVUH0pc Lots of research and studies: http://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/

According to Thompson’s statement “(t)he omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism. Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed.”

In a secretly recorded conversation, Dr. Thompson told with Dr. Brian Hooker, “I have a boss who is asking me to lie. The higher ups wanted to do certain things and I went along with it.” He told Dr. Hooker that “…the CDC has not been transparent, we’ve missed ten years of research, because the CDC is so paralyzed right now by anything related to autism. They’re not doing what they should be doing. They are afraid to look for things that might be associated…”

http://www.scribd.com/doc/220807175/86-Research-Papers-Supporting-the-Vaccine-Autism-Link

http://labmed.ascpjournals.org/content/33/9/708.full.pdf

http://autismoava.org/archivos/1-s2.0-S0162013411002212-main.pdf

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364648/

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21058170

  • Linear Regression revealed that Varicella and Hepatitis A immunization coverage was significantly correlated to autistic disorder cases. Autistic disorder change points years are concident with introduction of vaccines manufactured using human fetal cell lines, containing fetal and retroviral contaminants, into childhood vaccine regimens.
    http://www.ms.academicjournals.org/article/article1409245960_Deisher%20et%20al.pdf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Bc6WX33SuE&feature=youtu.be Dr Theresa Deisher – Worldwide Autism Epidemic & Human Fetal Manufactured Contaminated Vaccines

Vaccines need to be studied longer. They are usually studied only a few months after injection:

  • Measles helps a child’s immune system grow strong and mature.
    Once past the immunologic barriers of skin and mucosa, our (2-trillion-cell) immune system has two components: An innate system, which all animals have; and an evolutionarily more recent adaptive system that vertebrates have. The childhood diseases—measles, mumps, rubella, and chickenpox—play a constructive role in the maturation of the adaptive immune system. Two kinds of helper T-cells (Th) manage this system:cellular T-cells (Th1); and humoral T-cells (Th2), which make antibodies. The Th1 cellular T-cells are especially important because they attack and kill cells in the body that run amok and become cancerous. And they also kill cells that become infected with viruses.
    Measles (and other viral childhood diseases) stimulate both the Th1 and Th2 components. The MMR vaccine stimulates predominately the Th2 side. Overstimulation of this part of the adaptive immune system provokes allergies, asthma, and auto-immune diseases. Since the Th1 side thwarts cancer, if it does not get fully developed in childhood a person can wind up being more prone to cancer later in life. Women who had mumps during childhood, for example, have been found to be less likely to develop ovarian cancer compared with women who did not have mumps.
  • (The study can be found here.)
  • According to the CDC, food allergies in children increased by about 50% between 1997 and 2011. Asthma rates have also been on the rise, with an increase of 28% between 2001 and 2011. And childhood cancer rates have been increasing since the 1970s. The National Institutes of Health reported in 1996 that the incidence of childhood cancer had increased by 10% between 1973 and 1991, and a 1999 report in the International Journal of Health Services said that:

    From the early 1980s to the early 1990s, the incidence of cancer in American children under 10 years of age rose 37 percent, or 3 percent annually. There is an inverse correlation between increases in cancer rates and age at diagnosis; the largest rise (54 percent) occurred in children diagnosed before their first birthday.

    There are no definitive explanations for these dramatic increases in potentially life-threatening conditions among children, and in all likelihood there is no single cause responsible for any one of them. However parents have good reason to be concerned about harmful environmental factors, including vaccines. Indeed, several studies show increased rates of immunological problems associated with vaccination.

  • First, the concept of the immunization “schedule” is not well developed. Most vaccine-related research focuses on the outcomes of single immunizations or combinations of vaccines administered at a single visit. Although each new vaccine is evaluated in the context of the overall immunization schedule that existed at the time of review of that vaccine, elements of the schedule are not evaluated once it is adjusted to accommodate a new vaccine. Thus, key elements of the entire schedule—the number, frequency, timing, order, and age at administration of vaccines—have not been systematically examined in research studies.The second major issue that the committee encountered was uncertainty over whether the scientific literature has addressed all health outcomes and safety concerns. The committee could not tell whether its list was complete or whether a more comprehensive system of surveillance might have been able to identify other outcomes of potential significance to vaccine safety. In addition, the conditions of concern to some stakeholders, such as immunologic, neurologic, and developmental problems, are illnesses and conditions for which etiologies, in general, are not well understood.
  • http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK206938/?report=reader
  • There are significantly elevated risks of primarily emergency room visits approximately one to two weeks following 12 and 18 month vaccination. Future studies should examine whether these events could be predicted or prevented. The top diagnoses for the presentations to the emergency room during the 12 month risk interval would all be consistent with a mild viral illness. There were an additional 20 febrile seizures for every 100,000 vaccinated at 12 months. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236196/
  • “Our patient’s symptoms began manifesting two months following vaccination,” reads the study authored by four immunologists in Canada, Italy, and Israel. “An interval of six weeks between exposure and outcome is often used as evidence of a plausible causal association; however, immune and autoimmune diseases are chronic diseases that more often than not have a long incubation time.”“postvaccination adverse immune phenomena can have long latency periods (ie. month to years following immunization.)”If vaccine insult to the immune system initially manifests as vague symptoms of joint pain and flu-like illness and “bridging symptoms” are misdiagnosed and ignored, then lie dormant for a secondary trigger to precipitate into full-blown autoimmune disease, perhaps years later, what proportion of the current epidemic of autoimmune disease has its origin in vaccination? A 2010 report of the American Autoimmune-Related Diseases Association (AARDA) estimates that  50 million Americans are currently living with at least one of the more than 140 identified autoimmune diseases ranging from Crohn’s disease and type 1 diabetes to multiple sclerosis and psoriasis. It is also a leading cause of death among girls and young women.
    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/hpv-vaccine-linked-nervous-system-disorder-and-autoimmunity?page=2
  • “No safety comparisons could be carried out, emphasising the need for standardisation of methods and presentation of vaccine safety data in future studies. In specific cases, influenza vaccines were associated with serious harms such as narcolepsy and febrile convulsions. It was surprising to find only one study of inactivated vaccine in children under two years, given current recommendations to vaccinate healthy children from six months of age in the USA, Canada, parts of Europe and Australia. If immunisation in children is to be recommended as a public health policy, large-scale studies assessing important outcomes, and directly comparing vaccine types are urgently required. The degree of scrutiny needed to identify all global cases of potential harms is beyond the resources of this review. This review includes trials funded by industry.”Studies funded from public sources were significantly less likely to report conclusions favorable to the vaccines. The review showed that reliable evidence on influenza vaccines is thin …. there is evidence of widespread manipulation of conclusions and spurious notoriety of the studies.”
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22895945
  • …only 0.5% of sheep inoculated with aluminum vaccines showed an acute reaction within the first two to six days, marked by an array of nervous signs including lethargy, transient blindness, stupor, prostration and seizures.However, as following the lethal bluetongue vaccines, the delayed onset “chronic” phase of the disease varied widely, manifesting in 50-70% of flocks and sometimes affecting nearly 100% of animals within a given flock.
    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/new-autoimmunity-syndrome-linked-aluminum-vaccines?page=2
  • The study argues that vaccine-induced immune overload is a driving factor in a number of rapidly accelerating childhood epidemics including:
      • Autism
      • Type 1 diabetes
      • Asthma
      • Food allergies
      • Many autoimmune diseases
      • Obesity
      • Type 2 diabetes
      • Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFL)
      • Metabolic disease.

    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/study-links-vaccine-induced-immune-overload-autism-diabetes-obesity

Adjuviants – Mercury, Thimerosal:

  • the present study provides new epidemiological evidence supporting an association between increasing organic-Hg exposure from Thimerosal-containing childhood vaccines and the subsequent risk of an ASD diagnosis.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878266/
  • A new syndrome, namely the autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants ASIA, has recently been defined alluding to the key role of adjuvant in inducing an immune-mediated condition.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23733136
  • …severe meningoencephalitis in mice after vaccination and tracing the path of nanoparticlized aluminum in doses equivalent to what a human would receive.
    Aluminum’s toxicity was previously underestimated and denied for nearly a century, so what of other ingredients like the viral DNA contaminants (discussed at the congress), and the infectious agents themselves?  What if the whole vaccine model is just the hubris of a failing one-drug-one-effect paradigm that has vastly underestimated the spectacular complexity of the human immune system?
    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/new-autoimmunity-syndrome-linked-aluminum-vaccines?page=2
  • “this anti-inflammatory phenotype may be beneficial to the neonate at a time when tissue growth and remodelling events are taking place at a rapid pace… thus the inability of the neonate to respond to infection with encapsulated bacteria may be the risk the organism takes for successful development.” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17495050
  • in 2009, a Japanese study that gave mice repeated immunizations with antigen found that “(s)ystemic autoimmunity appears to be the inevitable consequence of over-stimulating the host’s immune ‘system’ by repeated immunization…”
  • In the journal Autoimmunity, Vared Molina and Yehudi Shoenfeld write“Vaccines, in several reports were found to be temporally followed by a new onset of autoimmune disease. The same mechanisms that act in infectious invasion of the host, apply equally to the host response to vaccination. It has been accepted for diphtheria and tetanus toxoid, polio and measles vaccines and GBS. Also this theory has been accepted for MMR vaccination and development of autoimmune thrombocytopenia, MS has been associated with HBV vaccination.
  • This is why babies produce reduced amounts of inflammatory messengers like ILI-B or TNF-alpha – nature designed them that way. Yet, the modern medical ethos to ‘improve upon Nature’ compels the addition of toxic inflammatory-provoking adjuvants to vaccines. Perhaps, in our hubris, we are yanking, unpredictably, on a complex web of psychoneuroimmunological and endocrinological effects.
    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/why-vaccines-arent-paleo
  • Recently, the ASIA (autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants) syndrome was recognized, indicating the possible contribution of adjuvants and vaccines to the development of autoimmunity.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22054760
  • The emerging link between autoimmune disorders and neuropsychiatric disease. Abstract:  Abnormal autoimmune activity has been implicated in a number of neuropsychiatric disorders. In this review, the authors discuss a newly recognized class of synaptic autoimmune encephalitides as well as behavioral and cognitive manifestations of systemic autoimmune diseases.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21304144
  • Long-term persistence of vaccine-derived aluminum hydroxide is associated with chronic cognitive dysfunction.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19748679
  • This study suggests that in some cases CFS (chronic fatigue syndrome) and FM (fibromyalgia) can be temporally related to immunization, as part of ASIA syndrome.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25427994
  • Adjuvant oils such as Bayol F (Incomplete Freund’s adjuvant: IFA) and squalene (MF59) have been used in human and veterinary vaccines despite poor understanding of their mechanisms of action. Nevertheless, the potential of adjuvant hydrocarbon oils to induce autoimmunity has implications in the use of oil adjuvants in human and veterinary vaccines as well as basic research.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15194169
  • Thimerosal added to some pediatric vaccines is suspected in pathogenesis of several neurodevelopmental disorders. Our previous study showed that thimerosal administered to suckling rats causes persistent, endogenous opioid-mediated hypoalgesia. These data document that exposure to thimerosal duringearly postnatal life produces lasting alterations in the densities of brain opioid receptors along with other neuropathological changes, which may disturb brain development.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20803069
  • A lymphocytic component was constantly observed in Macrophagic myofasciitis (MMF) lesions. Serological tests were compatible with exposure to aluminium hydroxide-containing vaccines. History analysis revealed that 50 out of 50 patients had received vaccines against hepatitis B virus (86%), hepatitis A virus (19%) or tetanus toxoid (58%), 3–96 months (median 36 months) before biopsy. Diffuse myalgias were more frequent in patients with than without an MMF lesion at deltoid muscle biopsy (P < 0.0001). Myalgia onset was subsequent to the vaccination (median 11 months) in 94% of patients. MMF lesion was experimentally reproduced in rats. We conclude that the MMF lesion is secondary to intramuscular injection of aluminium hydroxide-containing vaccines, shows both long-term persistence of aluminium hydroxide and an ongoing local immune reaction, and is detected in patients with systemic symptoms which appeared subsequently to vaccination.
    http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/content/124/9/1821.abstract
  • no more thimerosal in vaccines, but it used to have effect: study supports an association between increasing organic-mercury exposure from Thimerosal-containing childhood vaccines and the subsequent risk of specific delays in development among males and females.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4215490/
  • male neonates vaccinated with the hepatitis B vaccine prior to 1999 (from vaccination record) had a threefold higher risk for parental report of autism diagnosis
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21058170

 

“Thimerosal safer than Aluminum”

  • Many argue that the type of mercury found in vaccines, ethyl mercury via thimerosal, is not as toxic as methyl mercury. Dr. George Lucier, Toxicologist and Former Director of the Environmental Toxicology Program at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), clearly shows that thimerosal, ethyl mercury, is a developmental neurotoxicant and exposure to it holds the same dangers as methyl mercury. Dr. George Lucier has coordinated toxicology research and testing for many Federal agencies including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (EPA), the Food and Drug Administration, (FDA), the Occupational Safety and Health Administrations, (OSHA), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, (CDC). The vaccine preservative, thimerosal contains 50% ethylmercury. Its structural analog methylmercury, is a potent and well known developmental neurotoxin and substantial evidence exists that ethylmercury is also a developmental neurotoxin. Based on studies that mercury reaches the brain after thimerosal or ethylmercury exposure, the knowledge that the amount of ethylmercury in vaccines exceeds safe levels and the results from a number of health effects and mechanism studies, it is highly probable that the use of thimerosal as a preservative has caused developmental disorders, including autism, in some children.http://www.vce.org/mercury/lucier.pdf
  • This study demonstrates clearly and unequivocally that ethyl mercury, the kind of mercury found in vaccines, not only ends up in the brain, but leaves double the amount of inorganic mercury as methyl mercury, the kind of mercury found in fish. This work is groundbreaking because little is known about ethyl mercury, and many health authorities have asserted that the mercury found in vaccines is the “safe kind.” This study also delivers a strong rebuke of the Institute of Medicine’s recommendation in 2004 to no longer pursue the mercury-autism connection. Excerpt: “A recently published IOM review (IOM 2004) appears to have abandoned the earlier recommendation [of studying mercury and autism] as well as back away from the American Academy of Pediatrics goal [of removing mercury from vaccines]. This approach is difficult to understand, given our current limited knowledge of the toxicokinetics and developmental neurotoxicity of thimerosal, a compound that has been (and will continue to be) injected in millions of newborns and infants.”
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1280342/

Herd Immunity

If, as the mandatory vaccination proponents contend, we can demand that everyone around us take every conceivable precaution against every communicable disease, what else can we demand of them?

For starters, the recently vaccinated (with live-virus vaccines) should be excluded from all public property. And if not, why not? They pose far more of a risk than does anyone who has simply not been vaccinated. What are some other risky practices Americans should no longer tolerate from each other? Going out in public with a cold? Being a poor driver? Being in possession of any substance that might cause a severe allergic reaction in someone else?

How about superbugs? What are we going to do about all those people who abuse antibiotics, ultimately leading to the creation of superbugs. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria are responsible for nearly 15,000 deaths in the US each year, far outstripping pre-vaccine deaths for measles, mumps and whooping cough combined. Can we not hold the irresponsible people who take antibiotics every time they have a minor infection accountable for this?

http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2015/april/23/first-they-came-for-the-anti-vaxxers/

 

http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/herd-immunity-myth-or-reality

SIDS

Acloserinspectionofthemorerecentperiodfrom
1999to2001revealsthattheUSpostneonatalSIDS
ratecontinuedtodecline,but therewasnosignificant
changeinthetotalpostneonatalmortalityrate. Dur-
ingthisperiod,thenumberofdeathsattributedto
‘suffocationinbed’and’unknowncauses,’increased
significantly.AccordingtoMalloyandMacDorman,
”Ifdeath-certifierpreferencehasshiftedsuchthat
previouslyclassifiedSIDSdeathsarenowclassified
as’suffocation,’theinclusionofthesesuffocation
deathsandunknownorunspecifieddeathswithSIDS
deathsthenaccountsforabout90percentofthe
declineintheSIDSrateobservedbetween1999and
2001andresultsinanon-significantdeclinein
SIDS”

These nations should take a closer look at their infant death tables to determine if some fatalities are possibly related to vaccines though reclassified as other causes.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170075/

General

  • Linear regression analysis of unweighted mean IMRs showed a high statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates. Among the 34 nations analyzed, those that require the most vaccines tend to have the worst IMRs. Thus, we must ask important questions: is it possible that some nations are requiring too many vaccines for their infants and the additional vaccines are a toxic burden on their health?  These nations should take a closer look at their infant death tables to determine if some fatalities are possibly related to vaccines though reclassified as other causes.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170075/
  • Vaccine trials have usually excluded “vulnerable” individuals — only extremely healthy individuals with no allergies are recruited. It’s a “selection bias,” say Soriano and Shoenfeld, and has likely resulted in serious adverse events being “considerably underestimated” in “real life where vaccines are mandated to all individuals regardless of their susceptibility.” The true incidence of allergic reactions to vaccines, normally estimated at between one in 50,000 to one in a million doses, is probably much higher and particularly where gelatin or egg proteins are on the ingredients list, they say
    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/attacking-ourselves-top-doctors-identify-4-groups-most-likely-suffer-vaccine-0

 

Association of American Physicians and Surgeons: Key quotes from http://www.aapsonline.org/vaccines/cdcfdaexperts.htm below:

  • Dr. Johnston, pg. 14-15 & 19-20: “The data on its toxicity (shows) it can cause neurologic and renal toxicity, including death.”
  • Dr. Weil, pg. 24: “There are just a host of neurodevelopmental data that would suggest that we’ve got a serious problem.” …. “the potential for aluminum and central nervous system toxicity was established by dialysis data. To think there isn’t some possible problem here is unreal.”
  • Dr. Verstraeten, pg. 31: “we have found statistically significant relationships between the exposure and outcomes for these different exposures and outcomes.”
  • Dr. Verstraeten, pg. 44: “Now for speech delays, which is the largest single disorder in this category of neurologic delays. The results are a suggestion of a trend with a small dip. The overall test for trend is highly statistically significant above one.”
  • Dr. Bernier, pg. 113: “So we are asking people who have a great job protecting this information up until now, to continue to do that until the time of the ACIP meeting. So to basically consider this embargoed information.”
  • Dr. Johnson, pg. 198: “This association leads me to favor a recommendation that infants up to two years old not be immunized with Thimerosal containing vaccines if suitable alternative preparations are available.” … “I do not want that grandson to get a Thimerosal containing vaccine until we know better what is going on.”
  • Dr. Weil, pg. 207: “The number of dose related relationships are linear and statistically significant. You can play with this all you want. They are linear. They are statistically significant.
  • Dr. Brent, pg. 229 “we are in a bad position from the standpoint of defending any lawsuits”
  • Dr. Clements, pg 247- 249: “that I am very concerned that this has gotten this far, and that having got this far, how you present in a concerted voice the information to the ACIP in a way they will be able to handle it and not get exposed”
  • Dr. Bernier, pg. 256: “just consider this embargoed information, if I can use that term, and very highly protected information”
  • “We were disappointed by our inability to identify effectiveness studies with population or clinical outcomes. Given the existence of documented elimination of targeted diseases in large population by means of mass immunisation campaigns however, we have no reason to doubt the effectiveness of MMR.” So we believe it, because we all saw it happen, not because there is a study which shows it to be true. http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/vaccine-safety-myth
  • Dr. Healy, the former head of the National Institute of Health criticized the public health establishment for being “too quick to dismiss [vaccine concerns] as irrational…The more you delve into it, if you look at the basic science, if you look at the research that’s been done in animals, if you also look at some of these individual cases, and if you look at the evidence… what you come away with is that the question [of vaccine safety] has not been answered.”
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-kirby/dr-bernadine-healy-dont-d_b_101421.html
  • Furthermore, the non-specific effects (NSE) are substantial causing greater than fifty percent changes in all cause mortality in certain settings, yet have never been systematically tested despite the fact that millions of children receive vaccines each year. As we strive to eliminate infectious diseases through vaccination programmes, the relative impact of NSE of vaccines on mortality is likely to increase, raising important questions regarding the future of certain vaccine schedules
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21300095/
  • These data demonstrate that the cytokine profile of 6-month-old infants is influenced by the type of formulation of the pertussis vaccine they received at 2, 3 and 4 months of life. Large prospective studies would be warranted to evaluate the possible long-term consequences of this early modulation of the cytokine responses in infants.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17116347/
  • Studies funded from public sources were significantly less likely to report conclusions favourable to the vaccines. The review showed that reliable evidence on influenza vaccines is thin but there is evidence of widespread manipulation of conclusions and spurious notoriety of the studies.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22895945
  • Peter Fletcher, former Chief Scientific Officer at the UK’s Department of Health who was also the Medical Assessor to the Committee on Safety of Medicines, and thus the very person who determined for the UK government whether vaccines were safe. Dr. Fletcher has several times gone public with his concerns over vaccines, and with his frustration that “no one in authority will even admit [a vaccine-related problem could be] happening, let alone try to investigate the causes.”
    http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/lawrence-solomon/vaccine-skeptics_b_4548510.html
  • “For the immune molecules that we know are important, almost nothing is understood about their mechanisms of action.”
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3059681/
  • According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), “Immunity to a disease is achieved through the presence of antibodies to that disease in a person’s system.”[i] This, in fact, is the main justification for using vaccines to “boost” immunity, and a primary focus of vaccine research and development.
    And yet, newly published research has revealed that in some cases no antibodies are required for immunity against some viruses.
    Published in the journal Immunity in March, 2011, and titled, “B cell maintenance of subcapsular sinus macrophages protects against a fatal viral infection independent of adaptive immunity,” researchers found that mice infected with vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) can suffer fatal invasion of their central nervous system even in the presence of high concentrations of “neutralizing” antibodies against VSV.
  • The researchers found that while B-cells were essential for surviving a systemic VSV infection through the modulation of innate immunity, specifically macrophage behavior, the antibodies they produce as part of the adaptive immune response were “neither needed nor sufficient for protection.” These findings, according to the study authors, “…contradict the current view that B cell-derived neutralizing antibodies are absolutely required to survive a primary cytopathic viral infection, such as that caused by VSV.”
  • In fact, not only are antibodies not required for immunity, in some cases high levels are found in the presence of active, even lethal infections.  For example, high serum levels of antibodies against tetanus have been observed failing to confer protection against the disease.  A report from 1992 published in the journal Neurology found severe tetanus in immunized patients with high anti-tetanus titers, one of whom died as a result of the infection.
    In vaccinology, which is the science or method of vaccine development, vaccine effectiveness is often determined by the ability of a vaccine to increase antibody titers, even if this does not translate into real-world effectiveness, i.e. antibody-antigen matching.  In fact, regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, often approve vaccines based on their ability to raise antibody titers, also known as “vaccine efficacy,” without requiring proof of vaccine effectiveness, as would seem logical.
  • The obvious problem with these criteria is that the use of vaccine adjuvants like mercury, aluminum hydroxide, mineral oil, etc. – all of which are intrinsically toxic substances — will increase antibody titers, without guaranteeing they will neutralize the targeted antigen, i.e. antibody-antigen affinity. To the contrary, many of these antibodies lack selectivity, and target self-structures, resulting in the loss of self-tolerance, i.e. autoimmunity.
  • “Just because you give somebody a vaccine, and perhaps get an antibody reaction, doesn’t mean a thing. The only true antibodies, of course, are those you get naturally. What we’re doing [when we inject vaccines] is interfering with a very delicate mechanism that does its own thing. If nutrition is correct, it does it in the right way. Now if you insult a person in this way and try to trigger off something that nature looks after, you’re asking for all sorts of trouble, and we don’t believe it works.”- Glen Dettman Ph.D, interviewed by Jay Patrick, and quoted in “The Great American Deception,” Let’s Live, December 1976, p. 57.”
  • “The fallacy of this (antibody theory) was exposed nearly 50 years ago, which is hardly recent. A report published by the Medical Research Council entitled ‘A study of diphtheria in two areas of Gt. Britain, Special report series 272, HMSO 1950 demonstrated that many of the diphtheria patients had high levels of circulating antibodies, whereas many of the contacts who remained perfectly well had low antibody.” – Magda Taylor, Informed Parent“
  • “Human trials generally correlate “antibody” responses with protection – that is if the body produces antibodies (proteins) which bind to vaccine components, then it must be working and safe. Yet Dr March says antibody response is generally a poor measure of protection and no indicator at all of safety. “Particularly for viral diseases, the ‘cellular’ immune response is all important, and antibody levels and protection are totally unconnected.”- Private Eye 24/1/2002“
  • “Whenever we read vaccine papers the MD researchers always assume that if there are high antibody levels after vaccination, then there is immunity (immunogencity). But are antibody levels and immunity the same?  No! Antibody levels are not the same as IMMUNITY. The recent MUMPS vaccine fiasco in Switzerland has re-emphasized this point. Three mumps vaccines-Rubini, Jeryl-Lynn and Urabe (the one withdrawn because it caused encephalitis) all produced excellent antibody levels but those vaccinated with the Rubini strain had the same attack rate as those not vaccinated at all, there were some who said that it actually caused outbreaks. Ref: Schegal M et al Comparative efficacy of three mumps vaccines during disease outbreak in Switzerland: cohort study. BMJ, 1999; 319:352-3.”- Ted Koren DC“
  • http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/study-disproves-cdcs-primary-justification-vaccination
  • ‘Germs’ Beat Vaccines At Their Own Game: Anti-Malarial Probiotics Show Promise http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/germs-beat-vaccines-their-own-game-anti-malarial-probiotics-show-promise
  • May cause adverse reproductive effects based on animal test data. No human data found. May cause cancer based on animal test data. No human data found. May affect genetic material (mutagenic). Ingestion of very large doses may cause abdominal spasms and diarrhea. Animal studies have shown it to cause cardiac changes, changes in behavior (altered sleep time) and weight loss (upon repeated or prolonged ingestion). However, no similar human data has been reported.http://www.thevaccinereaction.org/2016/01/polysorbate-80-a-risky-vaccine-ingredient/

 

Antibiotics:

  • use of antibiotics during first year of life was associated with increased risks of rhinoconjunctivitis (odds ratio [OR], 1.97; 95% CI, 1.26-3.08), asthma (OR, 2.79; 95% CI, 2.03-3.83), and atopic eczema (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.22-2.17). Early use of antipyretics was related to an increased risk of asthma (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.11-2.13) and atopic eczema (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.02-1.71). Antibiotics during first year of life: 97% more rhinoconjunctivitis, 179% more asthma, 63% eczema. Antipyretics: 54% more asthma, 32% eczema
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16387585/

 

Fever:

  • Researchers found that, of the children who did not experience a fever during their first year, 50.0 percent showed allergic sensitivity. Of those who had one fever, 46.7 percent became allergy-prone. The children who suffered two or more fevers in their infancy had greater protection, with only 31.3 percent showing allergic sensitivity by ages 6 to 7.
    In particular, fever-inducing infections involving the eyes, ears, nose or throat appeared to be associated with a lower risk of developing allergies, compared with similar infections that did not result in fevers.
    http://www.nih.gov/news/pr/feb2004/niaid-09.htm
  • Use of aspirin and acetaminophen was associated with suppression of serum neutralizing antibody response and increased nasal symptoms and signs
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2172402
  • The data suggest that frequent administration of antipyretics to children with infectious disease may lead to a worsening of their illness.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7941999
  • A review of the literature showed that the only serious complications of fever were febrile status epilepticus and heat stroke, two rare entities. The great concern of parents about fever is not justified. Health education to counteract “fever phobia” should be a part of routine pediatric care.
    http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=509031 and http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=2001%20crocetti%20fever
  • Relative to the placebo group, single and combination probiotics reduced fever incidence by 53.0% and 72.7%, coughing incidence by 41.4% and 62.1%. Fever, coughing, and rhinorrhea duration was decreased significantly, relative to placebo, by 32% (single strain) and 48% (strain combination). Antibiotic use incidence was reduced, relative to placebo, by 68.4% (single strain) and 84.2% (strain combination). Subjects receiving probiotic products had significant reductions in days absent from group child care, by 31.8% (single strain) and 27.7% (strain combination), compared with subjects receiving placebo treatment.
    http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/124/2/e172
  • Avoid white, refined sugar.  It has been documented that refined white sugar can suppress the immune system. In a study reported in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition as far back as 1977 reported the adverse that sugar has on the immune system. Blood was drawn from subjects and the activity of the white blood cells that neutralize viruses and bacteria was observed and calculated. The white blood cell activity was calculated before and after subjects were given various doses of sugar: 6, 12, 18 and 24 teaspoons, respectively. Each subsequently higher dose of sugar created a corresponding decrease in the activities of the subject’s white blood cells.
    http://drtenpenny.com/the-importance-of-fever/
  • http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/brain-damaged-uk-victims-swine-flu-vaccine-get-60-million-compensation-1438572
  • Brain-Damaged UK Victims of Swine Flu Vaccine to Get £60 Million Compensation
  • Despite a 2011 warning from the European Medicines Agency against using the vaccine on those under 20 and a study indicating a 13-fold heightened risk of narcolepsy in vaccinated children, GSK has refused to acknowledge a link.

Share this page

Recent Categories

Coronavirus - COVID-19 Anti Trump Bias and Double Standards Fake News Propaganda Anti White Racism / Reverse Racism White Erasure / Great Replacement Systemic Racism White Privilege Health Crime Bigotry / Intolerance / Discrimination Race Baiting Violence and hate Subversion of country and society Fake Hate Crimes Leftists Right Wing / Alt Right Threat Canada Indoctrination / Brainwashing Leftist Policies Diversity and Multiculturalism Europe Immigration / Diversity / Multiculturalism Islam Attacks
View All

Recent Tags

ABC News Biden CNN MSNBC New York Times NPR PBS Time Magazine Washington Post The Hill ADL Jewry Media Matters black privilege bigotry of low expectations minority privilege Trudeau Leftist companies to avoid BLM Twitter
View All